Route the tool call.
Score tools against an incoming request before the next stage of your agent runs. Keep execution and permissions in your application.
Evaluate tool routing ↗Give ZEV the context and the choices. Get a score for every candidate in one forward pass, inside your infrastructure.
Rust / Candle · PyTorch · Inference on your infrastructure
INCOMING REQUEST
“I can’t sign in to my account.”
CANDIDATES / ILLUSTRATIVE SCORES
Same choices. Same scores.
Architecture illustration · example values, not model predictions. Reordering moves each score with its candidate. See the guarantee →
*For unchanged input text and weights, subject to numerical tolerances. Details & tie handling
Your application has a tool catalog, a set of queues, or a defined workflow. ZEV evaluates those candidates against the supplied context and question.
Score tools against an incoming request before the next stage of your agent runs. Keep execution and permissions in your application.
Evaluate tool routing ↗Evaluate support queues or incident destinations against a ticket. Measure costly misroutes and define an escalation path.
Score a bounded set of workflow actions. Validate behavior on your domain before connecting predictions to production.
Evaluate workflows ↗Each candidate reads the context and itself. The attention graph blocks communication between competing choices.
Order equivariance is an architectural property. Predictive accuracy, tool selection, and sub-30ms latency are validated across public enterprise benchmarks.
Agree on representative examples, acceptable errors, deployment constraints, and the current baseline.
Evaluate predictive quality, fallback behavior, order sensitivity, and latency on the target hardware.
Use the results to choose an integration scope and a commercial license.
Explore the economics of moving a portion of your routing decisions to a dedicated decision model. Change every assumption to reflect your business.
USD · Editable assumptions, not measured outcomes. The license default is a planning figure from the commercial draft, not a quote. Include your support and operating overhead in your operating costs.
Potential savings against your current routing cost.
Offloaded decisions avoid the current decision cost. All other decisions retain it. Downstream generation costs are excluded.
Validate the assumptions ↗A few things to know before you evaluate.
ZEV scores supplied choices. Your agent still handles planning, generation, tool execution, and permissions. Evaluate ZEV for a bounded decision step within that system.
The Rust and PyTorch implementations support inference on your infrastructure using model weights and a tokenizer. Your surrounding deployment determines network access and operational controls.
You can include and train an explicit “none” or escalation candidate. Automatic abstention is not an architectural guarantee. Confidence thresholds need domain-specific evaluation.
The repository includes training workflows and a local workspace for CSV intake, training jobs, and local HTTP deployment. Commercial training rights and adaptation support depend on the agreed license.
The documented workspace currently runs locally. Hosted infrastructure and billing integrations remain deferred. Start with an evaluation for deployment on your infrastructure or embedding.
Bring a routing workload. Find out where ZEV fits.